You still miss my point. I'm not complaining about safety. I'm saying that this event in particular is a proficiency qualification in for a _game_. Airsoft is a bunch of people of varying ages running around in the woods with toy guns. There are ways to enforce safe practices without turning the game into some kind of dick-comparing contest.
Think of it this way; Will having a patch that says that one completed this qualification course change anything about the person wearing it?
Matt wrote:I'm sorry, I don't mean to come off as harsh or single you out. It's just that I see this type of animosity towards Praetorian Guard all the time and there's no reason for it. They have done nothing wrong. They are merely doing their own thing the way they want to. But people wanna get all butt hurt and puff up their chests with this "OH, so you guys are TOO GOOD FOR US" type of attitude. I don't understand it. If they're doing their own thing, how does that effect the rest of you?
I didn't mean this at all as an attack on the Praetorian Guard. I don't know anything about them, and as such don't have any reason to dislike them. I don't feel like they're trying to be too good for us.
For instance, there was talk of this becoming the qualification for 1st Sword events. My criticism is about the way this course is structured, because I object to having to prove my ability to somebody else in order to be allowed to carry a certain kind of toy gun at fake gunfights. My complaints would only be more vocal if somebody proposed this kind of thing as an AP benchmark.
Anyway, to sum things up, I don't have anything against the Praetorian Guard, I dislike the premise behind the course, and I feel like even their interests could be better served by a different kind of qualification.