by Steve » Tue Mar 06, 2012 2:35 am
My $0.02:
It really irritates me to hear "safety kill" called from behind a chunk of cover. It's one thing (and generally appreciated) if you are staring down your optics at my 6 o'clock and all set to rail me from three feet away. That is unnecessary, but really neighborly. It's a whole 'nother animal if you try to call it when your weapon is 30 degrees off to the left of me, you're in the process of orienting toward me, and I break around cover with my muzzle pointed about 6" below your face. I already know you're there. I'm coming all angry-like to shoot you. If you aren't even oriented at me? Sucks to be you. If your muzzle isn't pointed at me, you can't call a safety kill.
My big pet peeve with safety kills? They aren't "area effect". It's a single-target courtesy, not some LARPsoft tennis ball with "fireball" scrawled on the side in Sharpie. If you run up on a group and cut the pie on their 6 o'clock, you should be covering individual targets with the muzzle, saying clearly and distinctly "safety kill", orienting the weapon to engage the next threat and repeating "safety kill" for each target or until one of your targets repays the favor by getting the drop on you.
And another thing: When someone is hiding inside a doorway, or is tucked into a piece of cover with no escape, and I'm pouring pellets right past them, chances are that I know they are there. It's why I'm shooting. Calling a safety kill while remaining entirely behind cover is pretty stupid. I'm probably in the process of cutting the pie. If they want to call themselves out before the stream intersects their fleshy bits, I'm totally cool with that. Or, they can try for a double elimination. But if they are pinned and can't expose enough of themselves from behind cover to get a legitimate non-blindfire shot at me, there's no way that should be a safety kill. I understand the desire to not get lit up in the bit that is exposed behind the rifle by poking their head out, and am totally okay with someone self-eliminating to avoid it. But, again, if you can't take a legit shot, you can't call a safety kill.
I'd actually rather see safety kills eliminated altogether. After a few experiences of getting pinned and eliminated behind deceptive cover, I reckon folks would be a lot less likely to trap themselves in bad spots. I'd like to think that it would encourage people to move more. It would probably just keep people from moving into buildings and such. Either way, the folks that knew how to move in and through close quarters would keep right on doing it. The people who didn't know would either pick it up fast, or avoid it altogether. I know for me, anyway, getting popped at close range is a pretty good lesson in not doing whatever stupid thing I had just done, and it tends to stick a lot better than a safety kill would.
This Week In Airsoft wrote:This Week in Airsoft stands behind its statement... The internet and YouTube can be your teacher.
