BSP CHALLENGE JAN 24-25 2009

This forum is for all games and events within the Pacific Northwest. All organizations/promotors are allowed to post events here, calendar posts are also allowed here.

Postby Osmo » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:20 pm

Attack37 wrote:Good thing I had the helmet cam that mission....:D

Don't get your hopes up too much. I had a helmet cam for CQC6, and none of the footage made the final cut.

My high speed tango-dropping skills remain a secret. 8)
User avatar
Osmo
Ranger
Ranger
 
Team: APST
Posts: 660
Age: 38
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 7:11 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Postby Fury » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:27 pm

Here you go I have one picture from this last weekend thanks to Stu.
Image

Hoping that this will get the ball rolling. :p
Last edited by Fury on Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
"WAR DOES NOT DETERMINE WHO IS RIGHT, ONLY WHO IS LEFT."
User avatar
Fury
Ranger
Ranger
 
Team: N/A
Posts: 663
Age: 43
Images: 1
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 11:43 am
Location: Eugene, OR

Postby john boy » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:28 pm

Rogue Reaper wrote:That is why from now on there is going to be a go no go grade for trigger control and target ID.

Shot a camera man or judge and you get docked.

Then tell your camera men not to stand behind or close to the OPFOR next time. I sprayed a camera man because we behind a OPFOR, getting that killer shot. Make them wear prison orange suits if you don't want them getting shot..
Image
User avatar
john boy
Specops
Specops
 
Team: RAC 5
Posts: 1510
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:20 pm
Location: Tualatin, Or

Postby TRAUMAHAWK » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:44 pm

I agree with Ron, RW civilians get in the way and do not wear bright orange. Lets develop some target identification and trigger control skills.
Image

Without risk, there is no reward.
User avatar
TRAUMAHAWK
Grunt
Grunt
 
Team: N/A
Posts: 70
Age: 38
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Postby Jester316 » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:54 pm

All you other teams are lucky. You ran the PSD in daylight. You could see what you were shooting at. My team did it at night. Didn't matter if the camera people were wearing bright orange. Although, I do agree with John Boy, a cameraman standing directly behind a target is likely to be shot, no matter who is behind the trigger. But, if you wanna look amazing in the photos/video, those camera people are essential. I know when I did photos for Op: Lazarus, I expected to get shot every time. So, I've been on both sides, and see how both arguments are valid.

So, here is the solution (as I see it, and I know my opinion is not really cared about):
Players: better target ID skills
Cameramen: TRY not to stand in the line of fire, but if you do, don't complain about being shot*


*I don't think anyone was really complaining.....
Image

FIRE CLEANSES ALL!
User avatar
Jester316
1337
1337
 
Team: SpecDet1
Posts: 5855
Age: 37
Images: 7
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 10:26 am
Location: Beaverton

Postby pittsmen » Wed Jan 28, 2009 12:15 am

If I may interject. All those excuses for camera men being shot are lame, and a bit sad.

First all of our Media people where wearing orange, I know because we had to yell at them at the start of every iteration to hide so they wouldnt let the upcoming team key off them.

Second... And this should go with out saying, but since seeing this last event it is apparent there has been a serious decline in the community when it comes to skill and talent.

If you have a target in site it should be three shots at the most. Two in the chest one in the head. But dont take three if one does the job.

The fact that people are spraying and blind firing at targets is just.... well its just kinda pathetic.

This is my own personal opinion, and I was not a judge in this compitition and you should all know that even though I was an actor I never gave my opinions on a team after its runs, nor did my opinions affect the scoring of this event. This was by far the worst display of marksmenship I have ever seen in the near 8 years that I have been in this community. As actors we were actually taken "Hits" when it seemed people had run out of ammo they were throwing at us.

There were a few teams that did a good job getting their shots on targets, even if they hit some civies. And they were mostly vet teams.

The fact of the matter is not only should you be expected to know how to fire your gun, you should be expected to fire it at the correct targets. I promise you, in the future you will be tested with shoot no shoot situations where you dont have the benifit of orange vests. You will have to make split second assesments of your target, AND shoot it.

Dont take this the wrong way. For the level of training that I saw went into this then you guys did a good job. But we all have A HUGE amount of room to improve.
User avatar
pittsmen
Ranger
Ranger
 
Team: N/A
Posts: 699
Age: 38
Images: 3
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:12 am

Postby Nocte » Wed Jan 28, 2009 12:59 am

pittsmen wrote:all of our Media people where wearing orange


Incorrect. Fred was not wearing an orange vest.

Most of the rest of your points still stand, however (minus the condescension).
ImageImage
User avatar
Nocte
Moderator
Moderator
 
Team: APST
Posts: 6927
Age: 44
Images: 10
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 4:21 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Postby Matt » Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:24 am

Let's dress an unarmed pregnant woman in BDUs next time we have a CQC competition. Let's see how many people shoot her. When you riddle her and her unborn child with bullets, you can say...

"But she wasn't wearing orange."

Yeah.
Image
User avatar
Matt
1337
1337
 
Team: APST
Posts: 9645
Age: 44
Images: 12159
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 3:32 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Postby Deliverator » Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:30 am

Why the hell would some random pregnant lady be wearing BDUs? I mean I could understand like just a polka dot dress or something with flowers on it. Maybe something with the same pattern as the ACUesk couch... but not actual BDUs...

If you want to bring civilians into it, instead of just throwing camera men out there without orange vests get more actors, keep all the camera guys in orange vests so that you don't break camera gear or injure camera men. Have people in plain clothes with safety glasses and all that be out there "running for cover" and screaming and crying and shit. You know, the little kid standing in the middle of a war zone crying like a stupid little phony pony while his mother is hiding behind a dumpster screaming for someone to "save her baby"
Deliverator
Specops
Specops
 
Team: N/A
Posts: 1048
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon

Postby Tombstone » Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:30 am

Your right, after the years of training the government put me through to give me target acquisition and trigger discipline i should really...oh wait...I'm just a dude with a toy gun playing soldier in the woods.
Image
No expectations, No disappointment
User avatar
Tombstone
1337
1337
 
Team: Mithril
Posts: 3871
Age: 38
Images: 14
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 3:22 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Postby Deliverator » Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:34 am

Tombstone wrote:I'm just a dude with a toy gun playing soldier in the woods.


*winces* Toy.... that is a faux pas's
Here in the "community" we prefer "replica firearm". [/joke]
Deliverator
Specops
Specops
 
Team: N/A
Posts: 1048
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon

Postby john boy » Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:37 am

If camera men don't want to get shot then they shouldn't be embedded in the enemy line. The largest target we say was chapped on the roof of the building. We plainly saw his vest and didn't fire on him. But if your holding a camera running with the OPFOR, expect to get yourself shot...
Image
User avatar
john boy
Specops
Specops
 
Team: RAC 5
Posts: 1510
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:20 pm
Location: Tualatin, Or

Postby Deliverator » Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:39 am

I think what they were complaining about mostly John Boy is that people were spraying at the cameramen. Meaning some of it was NOT incidental fire but they were targeted and fired upon directly.

Not saying your team did it, I'm not saying anyone's team did it. Just saying that is what they are talking about.
Deliverator
Specops
Specops
 
Team: N/A
Posts: 1048
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon

Postby john boy » Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:43 am

Deliverator wrote:I think what they were complaining about mostly John Boy is that people were spraying at the cameramen. Meaning some of it was NOT incidental fire but they were targeted and fired upon directly.

Not saying your team did it, I'm not saying anyone's team did it. Just saying that is what they are talking about.
Nice..
Image
User avatar
john boy
Specops
Specops
 
Team: RAC 5
Posts: 1510
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:20 pm
Location: Tualatin, Or

Postby Seagreen » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:00 am

If you don't wear something that designates you as media, you run the risk of being shot. Plain and simple.

In most games, you still run the risk of being shot with an identifier.

It's just part of the game. No one here is high-speed enough to never make mistakes.
"5 color Woodland....it's the new thing."
User avatar
Seagreen
1337
1337
 
Team: AIRSOC
Posts: 4317
Age: 51
Images: 6
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 9:05 pm
Location: Portland Or

PreviousNext

Return to Pacific Northwest Events/Games

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests